Across the country suspicion has hardened into conviction that eco-towns are just government spin. There have been lots of articles in the press covering the facts behind the rosy picture initially painted by Gordon Brown when he came to power a year ago.
Two factors are increasingly influencing the situation. The first is the rapidly rising price of fuel which will make commuting by car increasingly unattractive. As most of the proposed eco-towns are at some distance from any meaningful form of public transport this will make them less attractive place to live in. The second factor is the credit crunch and its effect on the housing market. Yesterday shares in Taylor Wimpey fell from 42p to 35p and they laid off 900 workers.
Not too many houses are going to get built in the next couple of years. This may give us time to re-think - something that our legislators seem reluctant to do.
Wednesday, 2 July 2008
Wednesday, 14 May 2008
Help to educate a minister
While you have to accept that the majority of people in the UK live in towns and that most central policies are town based one cannot escape the impression that our current government oscillates between bemusement and active hostility in its approach to the rural population.
The bemusement can be summed up by an article Melissa Kite in the Daily Telegraph that comments that a government minister recently telephoned her for advice on horses. Something equine had been included in his brief and she was the only person who he know who owned a horse or had even ridden one.
The hostility became evident during the row over hunting with hounds during which a number of senior politicians gave the impression that they believed that the countryside was entirely populated by jackbooted aristos who divided their time between flogging the peasantry and disemboweling small animals.
They now seem to have decided to concrete over as much of the undeveloped part of the country as possible. Probably hoping to remove the problem for ever or simply as revenge for the miners’ strike. (I have always failed to follow the logic on that particular connection as the Thatcher government was, in many ways, just as urban based as this one. However, that’s another issue).
A lack of understanding of country life has to be part of the problem. For example, look at the background of Caroline Flint the current housing minister. Elected in 1997 and one of Blair’s Babes she rose on the coat-tails of the Orange One (Peter Hain). Following the Hain implosion she is out there on her own.
We learn that she has a strongly political background having worked for local government in Lambeth and as a union official for the GMB. In other words, never had a proper job. She sits for a mining constituency. Not much experience of rural life there.
In an attempt the educate Caroline the Council for the Preservation of Rural England has an e-petition about the 3 million new houses that the government is planning to build. (They are against it). If you would like to add your signature you can do so via their website at www.cpre.org.uk
The bemusement can be summed up by an article Melissa Kite in the Daily Telegraph that comments that a government minister recently telephoned her for advice on horses. Something equine had been included in his brief and she was the only person who he know who owned a horse or had even ridden one.
The hostility became evident during the row over hunting with hounds during which a number of senior politicians gave the impression that they believed that the countryside was entirely populated by jackbooted aristos who divided their time between flogging the peasantry and disemboweling small animals.
They now seem to have decided to concrete over as much of the undeveloped part of the country as possible. Probably hoping to remove the problem for ever or simply as revenge for the miners’ strike. (I have always failed to follow the logic on that particular connection as the Thatcher government was, in many ways, just as urban based as this one. However, that’s another issue).
A lack of understanding of country life has to be part of the problem. For example, look at the background of Caroline Flint the current housing minister. Elected in 1997 and one of Blair’s Babes she rose on the coat-tails of the Orange One (Peter Hain). Following the Hain implosion she is out there on her own.
We learn that she has a strongly political background having worked for local government in Lambeth and as a union official for the GMB. In other words, never had a proper job. She sits for a mining constituency. Not much experience of rural life there.
In an attempt the educate Caroline the Council for the Preservation of Rural England has an e-petition about the 3 million new houses that the government is planning to build. (They are against it). If you would like to add your signature you can do so via their website at www.cpre.org.uk
Thursday, 8 May 2008
It's that man again
A headline in the Salisbury Journal reads ‘Council decision is a victory for democracy’. There is certainly great relief that the council has agreed to review and significantly change the plans to build 12,500 new houses in the area by 2026. However, nice though that is, I don’t think that we can afford to be complacent.
On the opposite page in The Journal is a letter from Julian Johnson (The Crusader’s Councillor for April 2008). Oh dear, why does that man irritate me so much? I must try to be more tolerant, actually he is only telling the truth.
Julian is responding to a letter published in a previous edition of The Journal which seems to have implied that the South West Regional Assembly (SWRA), on which Julian sits, is part of an evil EU conspiracy to subvert British democracy. Julian says that the SWRA does not receive EU funding and that 70% of the members are elected – as indeed they are but to County Councils and local authorities, not to the SWRA. The other 30% of members are appointed and are the great a good, or at any rate the available and compliant, representing one would guess special interest groups.
If you look at SWRA’s website they also make a big point of stating that they are not funded or directed by the EU. So presumably this is a charge that is made quite often which, of course, doesn’t make it true.
In two years all the regional assemblies will be abolished and their planning powers passed to the Regional Development Agencies.
Which leaves us where exactly? For a start awed by the amount of money that appears to be sloshing around, over £4.5 million for 2007/08, to support an organisation that meets three times a year, but I suppose they have lots of groups and sub-committees that discuss things and generally have nice thoughts.
The Crusader is most concerned that this whole vast edifice is really just a huge, expensive rubber stamp.
Julian states correctly that SWRA’s planning body originally came up with a figure of 9,200 houses for Salisbury District but that this figure was increased by 35% to 12,400 by an independent panel of planning inspectors appointed by the government.
So the SWRA, Wiltshire County Council and Salisbury District Council all just meekly accepted that they had to do as they were told, despite the fact that local consultation and experience had suggested that a much smaller number of houses would be appropriate.
I can understand civil servants obeying orders but our elected representatives? Surely they should have some backbone if they really think that something is wrong? Or am I being idealistic?
On the opposite page in The Journal is a letter from Julian Johnson (The Crusader’s Councillor for April 2008). Oh dear, why does that man irritate me so much? I must try to be more tolerant, actually he is only telling the truth.
Julian is responding to a letter published in a previous edition of The Journal which seems to have implied that the South West Regional Assembly (SWRA), on which Julian sits, is part of an evil EU conspiracy to subvert British democracy. Julian says that the SWRA does not receive EU funding and that 70% of the members are elected – as indeed they are but to County Councils and local authorities, not to the SWRA. The other 30% of members are appointed and are the great a good, or at any rate the available and compliant, representing one would guess special interest groups.
If you look at SWRA’s website they also make a big point of stating that they are not funded or directed by the EU. So presumably this is a charge that is made quite often which, of course, doesn’t make it true.
In two years all the regional assemblies will be abolished and their planning powers passed to the Regional Development Agencies.
Which leaves us where exactly? For a start awed by the amount of money that appears to be sloshing around, over £4.5 million for 2007/08, to support an organisation that meets three times a year, but I suppose they have lots of groups and sub-committees that discuss things and generally have nice thoughts.
The Crusader is most concerned that this whole vast edifice is really just a huge, expensive rubber stamp.
Julian states correctly that SWRA’s planning body originally came up with a figure of 9,200 houses for Salisbury District but that this figure was increased by 35% to 12,400 by an independent panel of planning inspectors appointed by the government.
So the SWRA, Wiltshire County Council and Salisbury District Council all just meekly accepted that they had to do as they were told, despite the fact that local consultation and experience had suggested that a much smaller number of houses would be appropriate.
I can understand civil servants obeying orders but our elected representatives? Surely they should have some backbone if they really think that something is wrong? Or am I being idealistic?
Wednesday, 7 May 2008
The only way to start the day?
One of the Crusader’s readers (a small but dedicated band) suggested that, as protest blogs can be a bit boring, I should break things up a bit with romantic descriptions of the beauty and tranquillity of rural life. You can tell that he only gets down here at weekends.
While vehemently denying that The Crusader is boring I thought I might offer a glimpse of country life.
Exiting briskly from the house at 6.30am this morning en route for Salisbury station I was surprised (a mild description of my reaction) to find a large rat expiring just outside the kitchen door. As it was not quite dead, but clearly unwell, it had to be dispatched with a spade before I started my journey.
The roads in and out of Salisbury are pretty busy at 6.35am and I wondered how many of my fellow motorists had started their day by squashing a rat. From their driving possibly quite a few.
It would be idle to deny that the village has a rat problem but so do most places in the UK. Isn’t it strange that even the most devoted animal lover can become quite enthusiastic about cruelty when confronted by a rat infestation? My murderous moment made me wonder how that arch defender of animal rights and vegetarian supremo Sir Paul deals with the rats on his estate in Sussex. Perhaps pop stars have a special entourage member for rat control or alternatively he may imagine that the rodents are all called Heather and do it himself!
While vehemently denying that The Crusader is boring I thought I might offer a glimpse of country life.
Exiting briskly from the house at 6.30am this morning en route for Salisbury station I was surprised (a mild description of my reaction) to find a large rat expiring just outside the kitchen door. As it was not quite dead, but clearly unwell, it had to be dispatched with a spade before I started my journey.
The roads in and out of Salisbury are pretty busy at 6.35am and I wondered how many of my fellow motorists had started their day by squashing a rat. From their driving possibly quite a few.
It would be idle to deny that the village has a rat problem but so do most places in the UK. Isn’t it strange that even the most devoted animal lover can become quite enthusiastic about cruelty when confronted by a rat infestation? My murderous moment made me wonder how that arch defender of animal rights and vegetarian supremo Sir Paul deals with the rats on his estate in Sussex. Perhaps pop stars have a special entourage member for rat control or alternatively he may imagine that the rodents are all called Heather and do it himself!
Monday, 5 May 2008
Fighting back
An interesting article in The Observer newspaper on how local communities can campaign against planning decisions. It starts with a row about the relocation of some Victorian lampposts in Ealing and goes on to give some helpful hints about ways to get the attention of your local council.
An argument about lampposts can seem trivial but it illustrates the growing gap between the government’s mantra about listening to local communities and the sad reality.
The campaigning tips can be summarised as follows:
If you want to protect your community, early intervention in the planning process is essential.
Planning law only gives 21 days for protest, so get everyone to look out for planning applications. The minimum requirement is a notice on the buildings that are next door or one one side, so good local communication is essential.
To fight an application, know your rights and get access to information.
You can make your point at local council meetings, but you need to check your speaking rights, which vary from council to council.
As a rough guide a petition with 25 signatures will get you a five minute slot at a council meeting - and five slots could be enough to make your case.
For more information see:
www.elflaw.org
www.planningaid.rtpi.org.uk
www.tescoploy.org
Friday, 2 May 2008
London is different
How many new houses do we need to build in Salisbury? For that matter, how many do we need in the South West?
There is an interesting report by the BBC on the differences between London and the rest of the UK.
http://www.20plus30.com/blog/2008/04/london-and-england-have-little-in.html
Extracting a few facts and figures, over half the country’s population growth is in London where 40% of the population are foreign born as opposed to 7% in the rest of the UK.
In London one person in 10 is a pensioner, in the rest of the UK one in five.
Last year the economy in London grew at 3.5% while the rest of the UK showed 2.7% growth.
We are assured that the housing needs of Salisbury have been based on figures drawn up by the Office of National Statistics. Given that their estimates of growth are correct – and they were prepared by the government that originally estimated the cost of the London Olympics at £2.4 billion and are now facing a bill of £9.3 billion – then surely the real area that needs new housing is London.
Spreading new houses round the county may seem fair, but building lots of accommodation in places that people do not want to live and forcing more people to commute huge distances every day is going to create more problems than it solves.
There is an interesting report by the BBC on the differences between London and the rest of the UK.
http://www.20plus30.com/blog/2008/04/london-and-england-have-little-in.html
Extracting a few facts and figures, over half the country’s population growth is in London where 40% of the population are foreign born as opposed to 7% in the rest of the UK.
In London one person in 10 is a pensioner, in the rest of the UK one in five.
Last year the economy in London grew at 3.5% while the rest of the UK showed 2.7% growth.
We are assured that the housing needs of Salisbury have been based on figures drawn up by the Office of National Statistics. Given that their estimates of growth are correct – and they were prepared by the government that originally estimated the cost of the London Olympics at £2.4 billion and are now facing a bill of £9.3 billion – then surely the real area that needs new housing is London.
Spreading new houses round the county may seem fair, but building lots of accommodation in places that people do not want to live and forcing more people to commute huge distances every day is going to create more problems than it solves.
Monday, 28 April 2008
Julian Johnson - The Crusader's Councillor for April
Who are our local councillors? I thought it would be interesting to have a closer look at one of two of them. Did you know that Councillors got paid? Not just expenses, a salary. Neither did I. Apparently the current Labour government introduced pay for councillors a few years ago. Still, sitting though all those meetings must be torture, I’m sure they deserve some compensation. But how much? Difficult to find out.
The most recent document I can find on the subject on Salisbury District Council’s website is dated October 2004 – Members’ Allowance Scheme for 2003/2004. In that year the highest allowance went to Mr. K.C. Wren, Upper Bourne, Idminston and Winterbourne - £18,519.42. p.a. I can’t quite make out if that is an allowance, i.e. expenses with an unlisted salary added, or the entire annual payment. Still I am sure it was worth every penny.
However, we shouldn’t quibble about the existence of salaries. What I want is a little more rigour for our money. Let’s forget the old adage about not biting the hand that feeds you, I would like a few bites on behalf of us electors.
Which brings us to our Councillor for April, Mr Julian Johnson, County Councillor for Downton and Ebble Valley Electoral Division. Julian brought himself to the Crusader’s attention by speaking at the recent extraordinary meeting of Salisbury Council on the planning controversy. He thought it would be useful for the audience to know how the consultation and planning process had been conducted and how the powers that be had arrived at their decisions. As an ex-Chairman of Wiltshire County Council and former Chairman of the Transport, Highways Planning Committee and the Council Planning and Transport group he should know. He carefully explained that they had met and consulted and eventually come up with the figure of around 9,000 new homes for the Salisbury District. (The Crusader plans to try to find out how they came up with this number.) Then about a year ago it wad decided by central government that the number of new homes to be built in Salisbury should be increased to 12,400. How? Why? Julian only said that he ‘thought it unlikely that central government would change its mind’.
Come on Julian! You were speaking the very day that the government did a U-turn on the 10p tax issue. You are a Conservative councillor so you must remember John Major. Governments do change their policies. Get a grip and pay attention.
Anyway, some background information. Julian lives at Newcourt Lodge, Nunton. Sounds lovely doesn’t it? Well, actually we all have a chance to enjoy Newcourt Lodge because Gillian Johnson runs it as a B&B. http://www.circlehotels.co.uk/accomodationinfo.asp?id=280 It is promoted as an 'Attractive house with many orignial features, set in mature garden with views over the Wiltshire countryside.' As indeed there are
- the image on the left shows the fields around Newcourt Lodge.
Curiously enough my perusal of the Black Book didn’t indicate that Nunton was going to have a huge development of 2,500 houses just next to it, but perhaps I have missed something. However, if they were going to build there I am sure that Julian would say a bit more than 'I don't think that central government is likely to change its mind.'
Julian has three council jobs, he sits on the County Council, is a member of the South West Local Government Association and is a member of the South West Regional Assembly, but I am sure that he can’t possibly draw three separate salaries for his duties. He also sits on the National Park Authority for the New Forest (probably just for fun with no payment) and has had a few trips to Brussels to liaise there on our behalf.
In his interests he lists military and colonial history, wildlife and the environment. He also enjoys travelling to remote places. Julian, just a hint, if you live in South Wiltshire, Brussels is not a remote destination.
The most recent document I can find on the subject on Salisbury District Council’s website is dated October 2004 – Members’ Allowance Scheme for 2003/2004. In that year the highest allowance went to Mr. K.C. Wren, Upper Bourne, Idminston and Winterbourne - £18,519.42. p.a. I can’t quite make out if that is an allowance, i.e. expenses with an unlisted salary added, or the entire annual payment. Still I am sure it was worth every penny.
However, we shouldn’t quibble about the existence of salaries. What I want is a little more rigour for our money. Let’s forget the old adage about not biting the hand that feeds you, I would like a few bites on behalf of us electors.
Which brings us to our Councillor for April, Mr Julian Johnson, County Councillor for Downton and Ebble Valley Electoral Division. Julian brought himself to the Crusader’s attention by speaking at the recent extraordinary meeting of Salisbury Council on the planning controversy. He thought it would be useful for the audience to know how the consultation and planning process had been conducted and how the powers that be had arrived at their decisions. As an ex-Chairman of Wiltshire County Council and former Chairman of the Transport, Highways Planning Committee and the Council Planning and Transport group he should know. He carefully explained that they had met and consulted and eventually come up with the figure of around 9,000 new homes for the Salisbury District. (The Crusader plans to try to find out how they came up with this number.) Then about a year ago it wad decided by central government that the number of new homes to be built in Salisbury should be increased to 12,400. How? Why? Julian only said that he ‘thought it unlikely that central government would change its mind’.
Come on Julian! You were speaking the very day that the government did a U-turn on the 10p tax issue. You are a Conservative councillor so you must remember John Major. Governments do change their policies. Get a grip and pay attention.
Anyway, some background information. Julian lives at Newcourt Lodge, Nunton. Sounds lovely doesn’t it? Well, actually we all have a chance to enjoy Newcourt Lodge because Gillian Johnson runs it as a B&B. http://www.circlehotels.co.uk/accomodationinfo.asp?id=280 It is promoted as an 'Attractive house with many orignial features, set in mature garden with views over the Wiltshire countryside.' As indeed there are
- the image on the left shows the fields around Newcourt Lodge.Curiously enough my perusal of the Black Book didn’t indicate that Nunton was going to have a huge development of 2,500 houses just next to it, but perhaps I have missed something. However, if they were going to build there I am sure that Julian would say a bit more than 'I don't think that central government is likely to change its mind.'
Julian has three council jobs, he sits on the County Council, is a member of the South West Local Government Association and is a member of the South West Regional Assembly, but I am sure that he can’t possibly draw three separate salaries for his duties. He also sits on the National Park Authority for the New Forest (probably just for fun with no payment) and has had a few trips to Brussels to liaise there on our behalf.
In his interests he lists military and colonial history, wildlife and the environment. He also enjoys travelling to remote places. Julian, just a hint, if you live in South Wiltshire, Brussels is not a remote destination.
The Red Mist Party
Apparently Kelvin MacKenzie (not previously my favourite person, but hard times make strange alliances) is standing as a local councillor in next Thursday’s elections. He has decided to become the founder member of The Red Mist Party. Red Mist rises when some action of local government changes your mood from grumpy acceptance to outright fury. Sounds familiar? Perhaps we should form our own branch.
His moment came when he discovered that Elmbridge Borough Council had increased the parking fee at Weybridge station by 43 percent to £5.00 per day.
Good luck with your campaign Kelvin and, when you calm down, just be grateful that parking at Weybridge is still cheaper than leaving your car at Salisbury station for a day.
His moment came when he discovered that Elmbridge Borough Council had increased the parking fee at Weybridge station by 43 percent to £5.00 per day.
Good luck with your campaign Kelvin and, when you calm down, just be grateful that parking at Weybridge is still cheaper than leaving your car at Salisbury station for a day.
Sunday, 27 April 2008
Eco Unfriendly
An article in The Spectator about the new Eco Towns proposed by this government and which are mainly to be built in non-Labour voting constituencies as part of the three million new homes by 2026 rush.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-magazine/style-and-travel/629411/tesco-village.thtml
Ross Clark writes much better than I can and covers the history of a site in Cambridgeshire previously turned down for development because it was a green field site with poor public transport links. This has now re-emerged as a potential Eco development.
In his article Ross asks why a site previously rejected on environmental grounds can suddenly become eco friendly and comments that the current planning process doesn’t owe a lot to democracy. I couldn’t agree more.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-magazine/style-and-travel/629411/tesco-village.thtml
Ross Clark writes much better than I can and covers the history of a site in Cambridgeshire previously turned down for development because it was a green field site with poor public transport links. This has now re-emerged as a potential Eco development.
In his article Ross asks why a site previously rejected on environmental grounds can suddenly become eco friendly and comments that the current planning process doesn’t owe a lot to democracy. I couldn’t agree more.
Friday, 25 April 2008
U Turn or Double Cross?
Well, I’m still confused. On Wednesday night I attended the extraordinary council meeting at Salisbury City Hall, but I am not sure that I fully understand exactly what decisions were reached.
There has been a huge fuss about the size of the development that has been proposed for Salisbury and, in our little corner of Wiltshire, an even bigger fuss about one particular option - building a new village of 2,500 houses on a green field site between the villages of Winterslow and Firsdown. There have been petitions, village hall meetings, a demonstration in Salisbury market square, a poster campaign and a flood of written complaints to the council. The extraordinary council meeting had been called at short notice in response to the public outcry.
The councillors looked quite nervous when we trooped in, filling the hall to the back and muttering evilly. However, the English middle-class are normally quite restrained when sober so the public gallery limited itself to raucous shouts of agreement when pleased and hisses and whistles when we disagreed with a speaker.
After about two hours the councillors forgot about their unusually large audience and concentrated on political attacks and personal abuse. At the moment Salisbury District Council is controlled by a Labour / LibDem coalition. As a group they mainly sit for city wards and one of the more serious complaints about the whole of the planning consultation process is that their communication with the people who live in the villages around Salisbury has been poor, or non-existent. There have been threats to sue the council over this which may have concentrated their minds a little.
After some party political abuse and recrimination the Labour / LibDem group came up with a number of suggestions and offers.
They first suggested that the option of the Firdown-Winterslow settlement should be scrapped. They then offered to re-submit the entire Core Strategy document cutting the number of houses that would be built. When I left at 9.00pm (hunger overcame me) they were still wrangling about details.
On the face of it this looks like a big climb-down by the council – but I wonder. In April 2009 Salisbury District Council will cease to exist and will become part of the much larger Unitary Authority to be known as Wiltshire Council. Will decisions made by our District Council in 2008 be carried forward? Will the whole decision making process be passed to the, largely unelected, South West Regional Council? Will Whitehall have the final say? Will anyone take any notice of our opinions? Are they simply trying to shut us up until the Unitary Authority takes over?
One thing is certain, the Wiltshire Council meetings will be held in Trowbridge and it will be a lot harder for 500 residents of Firsdown and Winterslow to travel to Trowbridge to protest when we are not happy with their decisions.
There has been a huge fuss about the size of the development that has been proposed for Salisbury and, in our little corner of Wiltshire, an even bigger fuss about one particular option - building a new village of 2,500 houses on a green field site between the villages of Winterslow and Firsdown. There have been petitions, village hall meetings, a demonstration in Salisbury market square, a poster campaign and a flood of written complaints to the council. The extraordinary council meeting had been called at short notice in response to the public outcry.
The councillors looked quite nervous when we trooped in, filling the hall to the back and muttering evilly. However, the English middle-class are normally quite restrained when sober so the public gallery limited itself to raucous shouts of agreement when pleased and hisses and whistles when we disagreed with a speaker.
After about two hours the councillors forgot about their unusually large audience and concentrated on political attacks and personal abuse. At the moment Salisbury District Council is controlled by a Labour / LibDem coalition. As a group they mainly sit for city wards and one of the more serious complaints about the whole of the planning consultation process is that their communication with the people who live in the villages around Salisbury has been poor, or non-existent. There have been threats to sue the council over this which may have concentrated their minds a little.
After some party political abuse and recrimination the Labour / LibDem group came up with a number of suggestions and offers.
They first suggested that the option of the Firdown-Winterslow settlement should be scrapped. They then offered to re-submit the entire Core Strategy document cutting the number of houses that would be built. When I left at 9.00pm (hunger overcame me) they were still wrangling about details.
On the face of it this looks like a big climb-down by the council – but I wonder. In April 2009 Salisbury District Council will cease to exist and will become part of the much larger Unitary Authority to be known as Wiltshire Council. Will decisions made by our District Council in 2008 be carried forward? Will the whole decision making process be passed to the, largely unelected, South West Regional Council? Will Whitehall have the final say? Will anyone take any notice of our opinions? Are they simply trying to shut us up until the Unitary Authority takes over?
One thing is certain, the Wiltshire Council meetings will be held in Trowbridge and it will be a lot harder for 500 residents of Firsdown and Winterslow to travel to Trowbridge to protest when we are not happy with their decisions.
Wednesday, 23 April 2008
How did we get here?
The Government has decided that 100,000 new homes should be built in the South West of England by 2026. South Wiltshire, the area around the city of Salisbury, has been instructed to find room for 12,400 of these new houses. South Wiltshire is only one twentieth of the land mass of the South West but has been allocated one eighth of the proposed new homes. No additional money will come from the Government for roads, schools or hospitals. The plans include a target for new jobs – but this appears to be based on pious hopes rather than reality.
Salisbury District Council appears to think that resistance is futile.
A quote from the Salisbury Journal of 17th April 2008
‘Salisbury Council has issued a statement warning that failure to meet nationally imposed deadlines for completing the consultation process (on the new development) would make a bad situation worse….. Put bluntly, decisions about where development takes place would be taken out of our hands. Housing and job numbers for South Wiltshire will be set by the government and developers, and local people will have not say in how and where this happens.’
Through rising levels of fury I began to wonder how our democratic rights had been suspended. This blog, written by someone who has always found local politics mind numbing, will explore and try to explain in plain English, how this very strange situation has come about.
Salisbury District Council appears to think that resistance is futile.
A quote from the Salisbury Journal of 17th April 2008
‘Salisbury Council has issued a statement warning that failure to meet nationally imposed deadlines for completing the consultation process (on the new development) would make a bad situation worse….. Put bluntly, decisions about where development takes place would be taken out of our hands. Housing and job numbers for South Wiltshire will be set by the government and developers, and local people will have not say in how and where this happens.’
Through rising levels of fury I began to wonder how our democratic rights had been suspended. This blog, written by someone who has always found local politics mind numbing, will explore and try to explain in plain English, how this very strange situation has come about.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)